It’s a fundamental principle that an accused person has a right to a fair trial. In the American legal system, this principle has been underpinned by the common law offense and reinforced by legislation. In each State and U.S. Territory, it is an offense for a juror to inquire about a person who is a party in a trial or any relevant matter to a trial.

This allows for an accused party the right to a fair trial where jurors have no prior knowledge or predisposed opinions on any of the parties in the trail so as not to influence the jury’s decisions. Traditional media, such as the news and newspapers, are much acquainted with the “law of sub judice contempt” and they never discuss the criminal history of an accused party. In recent times, it has become clear that information on trials, especially high profile trials, can be shared amongst social media channels, posing complications on an accused right to a fair trial.

Social media is a serious issue that has led to aborted trials in recent years. With the immediacy of information and opinions available on social media, it is very difficult to keep jurors in the dark about the past of those they are judging on trial. The single most significant challenge presented to the courts in terms of juries and fair trials are presented by social media and the misuse of it by the jurors. A number of studies have been conducted in recent years that have calculated the number of trials and court decisions that have been overturned, in part, because of juror actions related to the internet.

There are a number of ways that jurors have misused social media during trials. Some of the most common issues social media has presented to fair trials are jurors on social media to give the details of cases ongoing, commenting on trials after they have been concluded, and the use of social media to seek out responses or advice about the case they have been assigned to. Some less common, examples are communicating with parties of the trail via social media or friending and following other jurors during the trial. There have even been cases of jurors searching the internet for information on the accused parties that have not been submitted to the courts for the case.

It would be unfair to say that social media is bad for the criminal justice system as it has presented new opportunities for different institutions. Social media has presented police, for example, unprecedented access to the public allowing them to communicate in real time about incidents and events. Facebook and Twitter have become an important tool for investigations and forced an added level of transparency to criminal proceedings. But when it comes down the fairness of trials and courts making the correct decisions on big trials, social media has presented problems and complications.

Trial by social media has become a huge concern for the criminal justice system and poses threats to prosecutions and the rights to a fair trial. It is becoming increasingly important for the criminal justice system to reform the way it goes about jury selection and the court proceedings. Big time decisions in court need to be protected for the rights of the accused and social media has complicated this over recent years, posing more harm than good.

The old VAT rules, which were set several years back, are now seen as too restrictive and outdated. The rules have been regarded as being unfair to small businesses which have to undergo very inappropriate VAT compliance costs. The
costs are very high for cross-border transactions making it difficult for them to compete with domestic businesses.

In order to change these and give businesses opportunity for a fare competition, European Commission came up with new VAT regulations for more flexibility in Ecommerce and gives more opportunities for small business to venture into the
international ecommerce.

Foreign countries that operate online business have more than enough reasons to smile thanks to VAT regulation changes that work in their favor. The process has been simplified and they have room for big savings with special rules for sellers
and buyers of goods and services. The online sellers now have the opportunity to reduce ecommerce business costs hence increase revenue of EU countries.

The changes have made it easier for sellers as they will only use a single file for all their transactions in all EU countries. They will no longer register for VAT in every single EU country like they used to do in the past. This move is done to digitize the VAT system for the EU economy.

How companies will benefit from new VAT rules

Less administrative burdens

EU made VAT registration a one shop stop as they will no longer register for VAT in every EU country they stop. This means reduced administration costs and burden between companies. This will also enhance the administration cooperation
between EU states which will intern facilitate the process.

Increase ecommerce sales

Complying with the VAT rules was really costly in the past, but the new rules have made things easier as well as reducing VAT costs. This gives opportunity for new online sellers to venture into the international market because it is now a very
easy sector to thrive in. The new rules will also maximize international sales by increasing your online traffic and ensure you make more sales for more profit. This is a good way to increase ecommerce sales in the global market. “This is an interesting development in the online realm since many eCommerce companies have long gotten away with tax free sales overseas, and now the tide is changing, so it’ll be something to watch unfold and to see if these companies opt to continue doing business in the UK” says Colin of British Connections

Business is now easier

New entrepreneurs who are looking for ways to venture into the international market can now benefit thanks to the simplified rules. If your company has revenue of below $10000, it will continue to apply the VAT rules used in their country.

Another advantage is that competition is now made fairer as the imported goods are not exempted anymore from VAT. The new rules have removed the exemptions and traders cannot abuse it like they used to do during the past system.

The states under the European Union also have big benefits to take home. The member states will now make more revenue since the VAT files will now take place in one stop shop. So it’s not only the companies that will benefit but also the member states where the business transactions are done.

The profits that businesses make due to the new rules outweigh all the VAT costs making online business easier to small companies that are venturing into the international market.

Remember a time when you had to do something extraordinary to become famous?

As if being locally renown wasn’t hard enough, becoming a global celebrity seemed to take a miracle. Fast-forward a few decades to today, the modern age where smart devices practically rule over us. All it takes is a keen individual with a smartphone camera aimed at you doing what most people lack the courage or will to do and bam! You are an Internet sensation.

Celebrities are no longer distant symbols of picture-perfect living. Social media propelled most of them to stardom and it has proven to be the downfall of many. Recent examples of stars who got fired for public blunders are Nicholas Friedland, former communications executive at Netflix, and Roseanne Barr of ABC network sitcom, “Roseanne”.

There are differing reasons why employers took this extreme measure, justified or not. This seems to be a worrying trend in most recent times. Some of the most common reasons celebrities get fired include:

• Racially-insensitive remarks: at a time when everything is examined with close scrutiny, every statement uttered by our stars is a potential risk if it fails widely accepted norms of public etiquette. It does not even matter whether these utterances are made in public or privately, cast a doubt on the conduct of a celebrity and all manner of allegations surface. Proof is not even that vital if public opinion is what your fame has been riding on.

• Offensive comments and comments: whether making fun of a people group or publicly venting to perceived persecution, celebrities posting unpopular opinions on their social media pages always attracts outrage accompanied by consequences in the form of job loss and companies endorsing the shows publicly withdrawing. In most cases, no amount of remorse seems to set things right with the fans. There is little in the way of undying loyalty from fans these days. People will take it upon themselves to publicly ostracize their “fallen” stars in the most scathing manner.

Insults and threats become commonplace no matter how many times apologies are made. There however appears to be double standards in regard to the price a celebrity pays for their mistakes. Let us take the example of an athlete, say a professional boxer known for blunt statements. As long as this athlete performs spectacularly in the ring, the masses will forgive and quickly move on in most cases. This is a far cry from stars whose main selling point is being likeable. Unless you were uncouth even before you were in the public eye, your woes follow you around like a dark cloud for the rest of your days.

•Sexual harassment: This is by far the most inexcusable form of conduct a celebrity has been fired for. Lawsuits follow suit as previous victims come to the light. There is always a claim of being misunderstood when our stars fall short of the expectations we hold them up to. Whether true or not, our motives for ostracizing the people we once adored are seldom questioned. In a world where the rise and fall to and from glory respectively is as fast as our speed of communication, it would be a fair assessment to say that firms lose employees who would make them lose clients.

Divorce seems to be something that most people know about, and the reason behind this is not just about higher levels of education and consciousness but more because of a society facing an increasing number of divorces. Divorce statistics proof enough that divorce is more accepted now in society and another evidence of this is the increasing number of countries who now consider it legal.

According to divorce statistics, around 60% of marriages in the country end in divorce. Either this is valid or wrong remains to be a moral question. While most of us still believe in the sanctity of marriage, many married relationships have to end for some varied reasons. Divorce statistics also show that in second or third marriages, only around 20% of couples remain happily married. This means that a huge percentage – 80% – end in either fault or no-fault divorce.

Of course, when it comes to divorce issues, it is not only the couple involved in the marriage who are affected. In fact, those who suffer more are the children. However, many say that divorces can be a way to end more suffering both for the parents as well as for the children. With all these divorce statistics and reality, many of us cannot help but accept the fact that marital problems and divorces will be part of our lives whether we individually opt for them or not.

The Reasons Behind Divorces

Whenever we look at divorce statistics, it is also vital to look at the reasons and the stories behind the figures in these statistics. Doing this can help us understand more this societal phenomena. One of the leading common causes for divorce is “irreconcilable differences.” This term is regarded as the no-fault grounds for divorce, but it can be called other names. The general idea is that married couples simply can no longer get along with each other, thus, the filing of the divorce.

On the other hand, the fault grounds for divorce can vary much. Divorce statistics show that beyond are many failed marriages that end in divorce due to the following valid reasons – adultery, bigamy, desertion or abandonment, insanity, physical and emotional abuse and even long-term separation. These reasons would further be analyzed to be able to understand the divorce statistics more.

The Effects of Divorces

The increasing rate of divorces brings its effect. Of course, families can no longer stay together, and those who suffer most are the children of divorced parents. It is also a fact, however, that having divorced parents does not necessarily mean that the children will go wayward. Several divorced parents have brought their children up well and good. Many parents have managed to bring their children up well despite the separation. In fact, their divorce statistics also show that some families are better off after a divorce is made final.

Despite the increasing rate of divorces in the countries, there are quite many marriages that end up well. There are those couples which contemplate the option of getting a divorce only to end up reunited and happier together. While the statistics can show a slice of reality, it cannot hurt the whole picture of marriages and families.